Stability of biotite: experiment, theory, and application

695 indexed citations
published 1965

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w3247113 →

Countries where authors are citing Stability of biotite: experiment, theory, and application

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stability of biotite: experiment, theory, and application. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stability of biotite: experiment, theory, and application with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stability of biotite: experiment, theory, and application more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Stability of biotite: experiment, theory, and application

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Stability of biotite: experiment, theory, and application. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Stability of biotite: experiment, theory, and application.

About Stability of biotite: experiment, theory, and application

This paper, published in 1965, received 695 indexed citations . covering the research area of Geophysics, Paleontology and Geochemistry and Petrology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Geophysics (647 citations), Artificial Intelligence (299 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (123 citations), Biomaterials (60 citations) and Atmospheric Science (53 citations). Published in American Mineralogist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w3247113.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact