Go Downstream: The New Profit Imperative in Manufacturing
Impact in
- Marketing 564
- Authors
- Richard M. WisePeter Baumgartner
- Journal
- Harvard business review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w4493432 →Countries where authors are citing Go Downstream: The New Profit Imperative in Manufacturing
This map shows the geographic impact of Go Downstream: The New Profit Imperative in Manufacturing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Go Downstream: The New Profit Imperative in Manufacturing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Go Downstream: The New Profit Imperative in Manufacturing more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Go Downstream: The New Profit Imperative in Manufacturing
This network shows the impact of Go Downstream: The New Profit Imperative in Manufacturing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Go Downstream: The New Profit Imperative in Manufacturing.
About Go Downstream: The New Profit Imperative in Manufacturing
This paper, published in 1999, received 766 indexed citations . Written by Richard M. Wise and Peter Baumgartner. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Marketing (564 citations), Strategy and Management (343 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (315 citations), Management Information Systems (249 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (151 citations). Published in Harvard business review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w4493432.