Concepts and applications of molecular similarity
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Wiley eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w4112154 →Countries where authors are citing Concepts and applications of molecular similarity
This map shows the geographic impact of Concepts and applications of molecular similarity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Concepts and applications of molecular similarity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Concepts and applications of molecular similarity more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Concepts and applications of molecular similarity
This network shows the impact of Concepts and applications of molecular similarity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Concepts and applications of molecular similarity.
About Concepts and applications of molecular similarity
This paper, published in 1990, received 952 indexed citations . Written by Mark A. Johnson and Gerald M. Maggiora covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computational Theory and Mathematics (688 citations), Molecular Biology (435 citations), Spectroscopy (219 citations), Organic Chemistry (167 citations) and Materials Chemistry (149 citations). Published in Wiley eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w4112154.