Phenomenography-a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality
Impact in
- Education 700
- Authors
- Ference Marton
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3288768 →Countries where authors are citing Phenomenography-a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality
This map shows the geographic impact of Phenomenography-a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phenomenography-a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phenomenography-a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Phenomenography-a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality
This network shows the impact of Phenomenography-a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Phenomenography-a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality.
About Phenomenography-a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality
This paper, published in 1986, received 1.2k indexed citations . Written by Ference Marton. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (700 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (187 citations), Sociology and Political Science (148 citations), Social Psychology (91 citations) and General Health Professions (79 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3288768.