Will Affirmative Action Policies Eliminate Negative Stereotypes
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Stephen CoateGlenn C. Loury
- Journal
- American Economic Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w1954458 →Countries where authors are citing Will Affirmative Action Policies Eliminate Negative Stereotypes
This map shows the geographic impact of Will Affirmative Action Policies Eliminate Negative Stereotypes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Will Affirmative Action Policies Eliminate Negative Stereotypes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Will Affirmative Action Policies Eliminate Negative Stereotypes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Will Affirmative Action Policies Eliminate Negative Stereotypes
This network shows the impact of Will Affirmative Action Policies Eliminate Negative Stereotypes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Will Affirmative Action Policies Eliminate Negative Stereotypes.
About Will Affirmative Action Policies Eliminate Negative Stereotypes
This paper, published in 1992, received 521 indexed citations . Written by Stephen Coate and Glenn C. Loury covering the research area of Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science and Marketing. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (301 citations), Sociology and Political Science (272 citations), Gender Studies (122 citations), Safety Research (83 citations) and Education (56 citations). Published in American Economic Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w1954458.