Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage?
Impact in
- Authors
- Jay B. Barney
- Journal
- Academy of Management Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/258317 →Countries where authors are citing Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage?
This map shows the geographic impact of Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage?. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage? with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage? more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage?
This network shows the impact of Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage?. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage?.
About Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage?
This paper, published in 1986, received 911 indexed citations . Written by Jay B. Barney. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (527 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (272 citations), Accounting (137 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (127 citations) and Management Information Systems (127 citations). Published in Academy of Management Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/258317.