The Community Climate System Model Version 4

2.6k indexed citations
published 2011

Countries where authors are citing The Community Climate System Model Version 4

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Community Climate System Model Version 4. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Community Climate System Model Version 4 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Community Climate System Model Version 4 more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Community Climate System Model Version 4

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Community Climate System Model Version 4. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Community Climate System Model Version 4.

About The Community Climate System Model Version 4

This paper, published in 2011, received 2.6k indexed citations . Written by Peter R. Gent, Gökhan Danabasoglu, Leo J. Donner, Marika M. Holland, Elizabeth Hunke, Steven R. Jayne, David M. Lawrence, Richard Neale, Philip J. Rasch and Mariana Vertenstein covering the research area of Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (1.8k citations), Atmospheric Science (1.6k citations), Oceanography (547 citations), Ecological Modeling (307 citations) and Ecology (275 citations). Published in Journal of Climate.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1175/2011jcli4083.1.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact