Mechanisms of implantation: strategies for successful pregnancy
Impact in
- Immunology 766
Classified as
- Journal
- Nature Medicine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nm.3012 →Countries where authors are citing Mechanisms of implantation: strategies for successful pregnancy
This map shows the geographic impact of Mechanisms of implantation: strategies for successful pregnancy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mechanisms of implantation: strategies for successful pregnancy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mechanisms of implantation: strategies for successful pregnancy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Mechanisms of implantation: strategies for successful pregnancy
This network shows the impact of Mechanisms of implantation: strategies for successful pregnancy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Mechanisms of implantation: strategies for successful pregnancy.
About Mechanisms of implantation: strategies for successful pregnancy
This paper, published in 2012, received 1.0k indexed citations . Written by Jeeyeon Cha, Xiaofei Sun and Sudhansu K. Dey covering the research area of Immunology, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Immunology (766 citations), Reproductive Medicine (502 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (331 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (218 citations) and Molecular Biology (98 citations). Published in Nature Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nm.3012.