Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Freshwater Consumption in LCA
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/es802423e →Countries where authors are citing Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Freshwater Consumption in LCA
This map shows the geographic impact of Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Freshwater Consumption in LCA. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Freshwater Consumption in LCA with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Freshwater Consumption in LCA more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Freshwater Consumption in LCA
This network shows the impact of Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Freshwater Consumption in LCA. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Freshwater Consumption in LCA.
About Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Freshwater Consumption in LCA
This paper, published in 2009, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Stephan Pfister, Annette Koehler and Stefanie Hellweg covering the research area of Water Science and Technology, Ocean Engineering and Environmental Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Environmental Engineering (793 citations), Water Science and Technology (538 citations), Ocean Engineering (286 citations), Ecology (263 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (167 citations). Published in Environmental Science & Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/es802423e.