Notch Signaling Is Necessary to Maintain Quiescence in Adult Muscle Stem Cells
Impact in
- Surgery 115
Classified as
- Journal
- Stem Cells
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/stem.773 →Countries where authors are citing Notch Signaling Is Necessary to Maintain Quiescence in Adult Muscle Stem Cells
This map shows the geographic impact of Notch Signaling Is Necessary to Maintain Quiescence in Adult Muscle Stem Cells. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Notch Signaling Is Necessary to Maintain Quiescence in Adult Muscle Stem Cells with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Notch Signaling Is Necessary to Maintain Quiescence in Adult Muscle Stem Cells more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Notch Signaling Is Necessary to Maintain Quiescence in Adult Muscle Stem Cells
This network shows the impact of Notch Signaling Is Necessary to Maintain Quiescence in Adult Muscle Stem Cells. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Notch Signaling Is Necessary to Maintain Quiescence in Adult Muscle Stem Cells.
About Notch Signaling Is Necessary to Maintain Quiescence in Adult Muscle Stem Cells
This paper, published in 2011, received 425 indexed citations . Written by Christopher R.R. Bjornson, Tom H. Cheung, Ling Liu, Pinky Tripathi and Thomas A. Rando covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (372 citations), Surgery (115 citations), Physiology (93 citations), Genetics (90 citations) and Cell Biology (42 citations). Published in Stem Cells.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/stem.773.