Observation of intrinsic chiral bound states in the continuum
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Nature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05467-6 →Countries where authors are citing Observation of intrinsic chiral bound states in the continuum
This map shows the geographic impact of Observation of intrinsic chiral bound states in the continuum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Observation of intrinsic chiral bound states in the continuum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Observation of intrinsic chiral bound states in the continuum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Observation of intrinsic chiral bound states in the continuum
This network shows the impact of Observation of intrinsic chiral bound states in the continuum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Observation of intrinsic chiral bound states in the continuum.
About Observation of intrinsic chiral bound states in the continuum
This paper, published in 2023, received 477 indexed citations . Written by Yang Chen, Huachun Deng, Xinbo Sha, Weijin Chen, Ruize Wang, Yuhang Chen, Dong Wu, Jiaru Chu, Yuri S. Kivshar and Shumin Xiao covering the research area of Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (273 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (228 citations), Biomedical Engineering (173 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (131 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (94 citations). Published in Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05467-6.