Zoé Bollen

439 citations
23 papers · 292 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Zoé Bollen

20 papers receiving 288 citations

Peers

Zoé Bollen
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Applied Psychology 34
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 63
  • Clinical Psychology 74
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 44
  • Human-Computer Interaction 11
Replace Natale Salvatore Bonfiglio with:
Natale Salvatore Bonfiglio Italy
Caroline de Oliveira Cardoso Brazil
Karen L. Wilhelm United States
Elizabeth T. Ryan United States
Ignacio Lucas Spain
Claire L. Morrison United States
Cristina Rivas Spain
Suzy J. M. A. Matthijssen Netherlands
Neil L. Nixon United Kingdom
Peter Baggetta United States
Zoé Bollen relative to Natale Salvatore Bonfiglio Italy Natale Salvatore Bonfiglio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Natale Salvatore Bonfiglio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Zoé Bollen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Zoé Bollen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zoé Bollen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zoé Bollen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Zoé Bollen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zoé Bollen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zoé Bollen. The network helps show where Zoé Bollen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Zoé Bollen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Zoé Bollen Line = papers co-authored together Zoé Bollen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202069
2 201939
3 202023
4 202020
5 202017
6 202217
7 202117
8 202115
9 202114
10 202310
11 202110
12 20209
13 20219
14 20208
15 20228
16 20232
17 20202
18 20231
19 20221
20 20231

About Zoé Bollen

Zoé Bollen is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 292 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (2 papers) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (34 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (63 citations), Clinical Psychology (74 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (44 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (11 citations). Zoé Bollen has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, France and Luxembourg. Frequent co-authors include Pierre Maurage, Nicolas Masson, Fabien D’Hondt, Arthur Pabst, Sullivan Fontesse, Séverine Lannoy, Valérie Dormal, Matt Field, Alice Lanièpce and Mauro Pesenti. Their work appears in journals such as Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, Journal of Psychopharmacology, Psychopharmacology, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews and Journal of Affective Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact