Zikai Wu

706 citations
38 papers · 515 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Zikai Wu

35 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers

Zikai Wu
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 154
  • Immunology 146
  • Computational Mathematics 3
  • Cancer Research 65
  • Molecular Biology 258
Replace Petteri Hintsanen with:
Petteri Hintsanen Finland
Ioannis Iliopoulos Greece
Takeyuki Tamura Japan
Dong Yue Canada
Onur Sumer Canada
Vladislav Vyshemirsky United Kingdom
K. Srinivas India
Hailin Hu China
Silpa Suthram United States
Joshi-Tope Geeta United States
Zikai Wu relative to Petteri Hintsanen Finland Petteri Hintsanen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Petteri Hintsanen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Zikai Wu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Zikai Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zikai Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zikai Wu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Zikai Wu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zikai Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zikai Wu. The network helps show where Zikai Wu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Zikai Wu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Zikai Wu Line = papers co-authored together Zikai Wu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017166
2 2013117
3 201068
4 200936
5 201115
6 201414
7 202413
8 20138
9 20148
10 20128
11 20236
12 20116
13 20176
14 20186
15 20225
16 20135
17 20233
18 20193
19 20193
20 20122

About Zikai Wu

Zikai Wu is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Plant Science and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 38 papers that have together received 515 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complex Network Analysis Techniques (9 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (7 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (7 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (5 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (4 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (3 papers), Advanced Image Fusion Techniques (2 papers) and Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (154 citations), Immunology (146 citations), Computational Mathematics (3 citations), Cancer Research (65 citations) and Molecular Biology (258 citations). Zikai Wu has collaborated with scholars based in China, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Luonan Chen, Xing‐Ming Zhao, Sankar Ghosh, Will Liao, Hyun-Ju Oh, Yenkel Grinberg‐Bleyer, Nicole Heise, Pingzhang Wang, Roland M. Schmid and Jiguang Wang. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Systems Biology, IET Systems Biology, Neurocomputing, Planta and Molecules and Cells.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact