Zhidi Lin

467 citations
23 papers · 313 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Zhidi Lin

20 papers receiving 311 citations

Peers

Zhidi Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 69
  • Cancer Research 55
  • Biological Psychiatry 9
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 14
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 28
Replace Wenting Lin with:
Wenting Lin China
Dongxu Li China
Jingwei Zhao China
Eun Kyung Kim South Korea
Yudai Shimoda Japan
Giuseppina Iannelli Italy
Yongjie Zhao China
Weijun Huang China
Anzel Bahadır Türkiye
Zhidi Lin relative to Wenting Lin China Wenting Lin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Wenting Lin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Zhidi Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Zhidi Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zhidi Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zhidi Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Zhidi Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zhidi Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zhidi Lin. The network helps show where Zhidi Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Zhidi Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Zhidi Lin Line = papers co-authored together Zhidi Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202352
2 201634
3 202033
4 202428
5 202226
6 201621
7 202419
8 202017
9 202016
10 202314
11 201412
12 202110
13 20248
14 20158
15 20215
16 20213
17 20253
18
A NEW SPECIES OF THE GENUS RHIZOGLYPHUS (ACARINA: ACARIDAE) FROM CHINA
19902
19 20251
20 20251

About Zhidi Lin

Zhidi Lin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cancer Research and Pharmacology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (6 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Study of Mite Species (2 papers), Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases (2 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (2 papers), Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (2 papers), S100 Proteins and Annexins (2 papers) and Circular RNAs in diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (69 citations), Cancer Research (55 citations), Biological Psychiatry (9 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (14 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (28 citations). Zhidi Lin has collaborated with scholars based in China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Fei Zou, Guangyu Xu, Xiao Lu, Xiaosheng Ma, Jianyuan Jiang, Jian Song, Siyang Liu, Xinlei Xia, Zhe Pan and Chuqiao Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Aging Cell, Sleep Medicine, Annals of Palliative Medicine, Medicine and Biomaterials Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact