Zehra Taşkın

653 citations
43 papers · 436 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Zehra Taşkın

37 papers receiving 409 citations

Peers

Zehra Taşkın
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 105
  • Information Systems and Management 80
  • Library and Information Sciences 12
  • Health Informatics 7
  • Information Systems 109
Replace Stacy Konkiel with:
Stacy Konkiel United States
Dirk Tunger Germany
Krishna Subramanyam United States
Fernanda Peset Spain
Vincent Larivière Canada
Simon Wakeling Australia
Chris Rensleigh South Africa
Susanne Mikki Norway
Bree Norlander United States
Rachel Volentine United States
Zehra Taşkın relative to Stacy Konkiel United States Stacy Konkiel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Stacy Konkiel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Zehra Taşkın

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Zehra Taşkın's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zehra Taşkın with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zehra Taşkın more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Zehra Taşkın

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zehra Taşkın. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zehra Taşkın. The network helps show where Zehra Taşkın may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Zehra Taşkın, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Zehra Taşkın Line = papers co-authored together Zehra Taşkın links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201568
2 201745
3 201938
4 201731
5 202124
6 202123
7 201022
8 201321
9 202220
10 201718
11 202015
12 202213
13 202310
14 20139
15
Use of Social Network Analysis in Bibliometric Researches 1
20127
16 20147
17 20206
18 20136
19 20235
20 20205

About Zehra Taşkın

Zehra Taşkın is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Information Systems, Information Systems and Management, Artificial Intelligence and Education, having authored 43 papers that have together received 436 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (19 papers), Research Data Management Practices (7 papers), Web and Library Services (4 papers), Web visibility and informetrics (4 papers), Educational Methods and Analysis (3 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (3 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (3 papers) and Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (105 citations), Information Systems and Management (80 citations), Library and Information Sciences (12 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations) and Information Systems (109 citations). Zehra Taşkın has collaborated with scholars based in Türkiye, Poland and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Umut Al, Arsev Umur Aydınoğlu, Emanuel Kulczycki, Alesia Zuccala, Yaşar Tonta, Serap Kurbanoğlu, Janne Pölönen, Tim Engels, Raf Guns and Lin Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Scientometrics, Quantitative Science Studies, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Journal of Informetrics and Library Hi Tech.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact