Ze Meng

1.3k citations
72 papers · 919 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Ze Meng

62 papers receiving 893 citations

Peers

Ze Meng
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Global and Planetary Change 460
  • Soil Science 184
  • Atmospheric Science 257
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 138
  • Water Science and Technology 107
Replace Leon van der Linden with:
Leon van der Linden Australia
Milan Fischer Czechia
Miriam Machwitz Germany
Alexandra R. Contosta United States
Xue Wu China
Pengsen Sun China
Yunming Chen China
P. C. Smith Germany
Wenfang Xu China
Ze Meng relative to Leon van der Linden Australia Leon van der Linden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Leon van der Linden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ze Meng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ze Meng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ze Meng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ze Meng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ze Meng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ze Meng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ze Meng. The network helps show where Ze Meng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ze Meng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ze Meng Line = papers co-authored together Ze Meng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011233
2 202266
3 201445
4 202141
5 200730
6 202230
7 202025
8 201924
9 202023
10 201923
11 201423
12 202022
13 202022
14 202221
15 202019
16 202015
17 202113
18 202013
19 202312
20 202112

About Ze Meng

Ze Meng is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Soil Science, having authored 72 papers that have together received 919 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (22 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (8 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (8 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (8 papers), Climate variability and models (8 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (6 papers), Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (6 papers) and Forest ecology and management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (460 citations), Soil Science (184 citations), Atmospheric Science (257 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (138 citations) and Water Science and Technology (107 citations). Ze Meng has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Guowei Chu, Juxiu Liu, Guoyi Zhou, Shizhong Liu, Deqiang Zhang, Qianmei Zhang, Xuli Tang, Junhua Yan, Chunlin Wang and Xiaodong Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Global Change Biology, The Science of The Total Environment, Forest Ecology and Management, Climate Dynamics and Geophysical Research Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact