Z Rayter

422 citations
8 papers · 322 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

    • Breast Implant and Reconstruction 3
    • Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques 2
    • Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 3

Z Rayter

8 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

Z Rayter
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Cancer Research 99
  • Genetics 156
  • Oncology 118
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 75
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 19
Replace Kenji Higaki with:
Kenji Higaki Japan
Antonino Bonaventura Australia
Karin Elebro Sweden
Naoko I. Simonds United States
E.R. Koomen Netherlands
D. Aldrighetti Italy
C. Tausch Austria
Bryony Eccles United Kingdom
Kiel T. Carson Butterfield United States
Jan C. Drooger Netherlands
Z Rayter relative to Kenji Higaki Japan Kenji Higaki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Kenji Higaki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Z Rayter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Z Rayter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Z Rayter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Z Rayter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Z Rayter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Z Rayter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Z Rayter. The network helps show where Z Rayter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Z Rayter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Z Rayter Line = papers co-authored together Z Rayter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1
Comparison of the short-term biological effects of 7alpha-[9-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentylsulfinyl)-nonyl]estra-1,3,5, (10)-triene-3,17beta-diol (Faslodex) versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer.
2001190
2 200255
3 200754
4 200314
5 20094
6
In-situ carcinoma of the breast.
19903
7 20111
8 20121

About Z Rayter

Z Rayter is a scholar working on Surgery, Cancer Research, Oncology, Genetics and Molecular Biology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (3 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (2 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (2 papers), Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies (1 paper), Digital Imaging in Medicine (1 paper), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (1 paper) and Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (99 citations), Genetics (156 citations), Oncology (118 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (75 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (19 citations). Z Rayter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mitch Dowsett, Robert I. Nicholson, Elizabeth Anderson, J.F.R. Robertson, John Fox, Alan Webster, Charles Morris, A. E. Wakeling, Michael J. Dixon and Julia M.W. Gee. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Surgical Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, British Journal of Health Psychology, Cancer Research and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact