Marcus Galea
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Oncology top 10%
- HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Papers in
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 5
-
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas 4
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer 1
- Co-authors
- Roger W. Blamey (2 shared papers)Ian O. Ellis (2 shared papers)C.W. Elston (1 shared paper)David Poller (1 shared paper)M. Victoria Greenslade (1 shared paper)Helen Thomson (1 shared paper)Z Rayter (1 shared paper)Alexander M. Reece-Smith (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (1 paper)Journal of Pediatric Surgery (1 paper)European Journal of Surgical Oncology (1 paper)The Breast (1 paper)Surgery (Oxford) (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Marcus Galea
7 papers receiving 875 citations
Marcus Galea's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Cancer Research 433
- Oncology 298
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 126
- Statistics and Probability 27
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 63
Countries citing papers authored by Marcus Galea
This map shows the geographic impact of Marcus Galea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marcus Galea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marcus Galea more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marcus Galea
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marcus Galea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marcus Galea. The network helps show where Marcus Galea may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Marcus Galea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Nottingham prognostic index in primary breast cancer Hit paper breakdown → | 1992 | 875 |
| 2 | 1988 | 10 | |
| 3 | 1992 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 5 | SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF OCCULT BLOOD TESTING IN SYMPTOMATIC SINGLE DUCT NIPPLE DISCHARGE TO DETECT DUCTAL CARCINOMA | 2013 | 1 |
| 6 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 1 |
About Marcus Galea
Marcus Galea is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Dermatology, Surgery and Oncology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 894 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (5 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (4 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (3 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (1 paper), Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (1 paper), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (1 paper) and Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (433 citations), Oncology (298 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (126 citations), Statistics and Probability (27 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (63 citations). Marcus Galea has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Roger W. Blamey, Ian O. Ellis, C.W. Elston, David Poller, M. Victoria Greenslade, Helen Thomson, Z Rayter, Alexander M. Reece-Smith, Eva Weiler-Mithoff and S Nicholson. Their work appears in journals such as Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, Journal of Pediatric Surgery, European Journal of Surgical Oncology, The Breast and Surgery (Oxford).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.