Yang‐Min Ning

3.4k citations
37 papers · 2.3k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Yang‐Min Ning

37 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Yang‐Min Ning
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Oncology 777
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 97
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 535
  • Cancer Research 240
  • Immunology 350
Replace Geon Kook Lee with:
Geon Kook Lee South Korea
Kimio Ushijima Japan
Werner Rittgen Germany
R.D. Rubens United Kingdom
Eric Jonasch United States
Young H. Kim United States
Miles C. Andrews Australia
Zhenling Yao United States
S P Balcerzak United States
Anne M. Noonan United States
Yang‐Min Ning relative to Geon Kook Lee South Korea Geon Kook Lee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Geon Kook Lee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Yang‐Min Ning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Yang‐Min Ning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Yang‐Min Ning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Yang‐Min Ning more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Yang‐Min Ning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Yang‐Min Ning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Yang‐Min Ning. The network helps show where Yang‐Min Ning may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Yang‐Min Ning, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Yang‐Min Ning Line = papers co-authored together Yang‐Min Ning links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002346
2 2019235
3 2010201
4 2005156
5 2011155
6 2018141
7 2010114
8 2017113
9 2011106
10 2009106
11 201198
12 199367
13 201852
14 201349
15
Liposomal doxorubicin in combination with bortezomib for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
200748
16 201339
17 201736
18 201536
19 201431
20 199528

About Yang‐Min Ning

Yang‐Min Ning is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Hematology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (13 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (12 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (9 papers), Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (6 papers), Heat shock proteins research (5 papers), Signaling Pathways in Disease (5 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (4 papers) and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (777 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (97 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (535 citations), Cancer Research (240 citations) and Immunology (350 citations). Yang‐Min Ning has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Edwin R. Sánchez, Richard Pazdur, Robert Justice, William L. Dahut, V. Ellen Maher, Shenghui Tang, Patricia Keegan, Rajeshwari Sridhara, William D. Figg and James L. Gulley. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Clinical Cancer Research, The Oncologist, Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science and Biochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact