Yang Xiao-hui

467 citations
34 papers · 342 · h-index 12

Impact in

    • Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Education top 10%
    • Child Development and Digital Technology
    • Early Childhood Education and Development

Papers in

Yang Xiao-hui

29 papers receiving 330 citations

Peers

Yang Xiao-hui
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Social Psychology 118
  • Education 142
  • Clinical Psychology 95
  • Communication 25
  • Sociology and Political Science 147
Replace Xinchen Fu with:
Xinchen Fu China
Mónica Gutiérrez‐Ortega Spain
Jie Fang China
Suo Jiang China
Mingkun Ouyang China
Ryan Dwyer Canada
Maria Lidia Mascia Italy
Bahadır Bozoğlan Türkiye
Ahmet Rıfat Kayiş Türkiye
Yaakov Ophir Israel
Yang Xiao-hui relative to Xinchen Fu China Xinchen Fu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Xinchen Fu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Yang Xiao-hui

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Yang Xiao-hui's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Yang Xiao-hui with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Yang Xiao-hui more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Yang Xiao-hui

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Yang Xiao-hui. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Yang Xiao-hui. The network helps show where Yang Xiao-hui may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Yang Xiao-hui, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Yang Xiao-hui Line = papers co-authored together Yang Xiao-hui links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201869
2 201737
3 201534
4 201919
5 201518
6 202116
7 201916
8 202015
9 202014
10 201613
11 202213
12 200813
13 201611
14 20208
15 20217
16 20217
17 20226
18 20205
19 20174
20 20204

About Yang Xiao-hui

Yang Xiao-hui is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Education, having authored 34 papers that have together received 342 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (7 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (5 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (3 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers) and Higher Education and Teaching Methods (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (118 citations), Education (142 citations), Clinical Psychology (95 citations), Communication (25 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (147 citations). Yang Xiao-hui has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Zhenhong Wang, Liqi Zhu, Huan Chen, Zhe Chen, Biyan Wen, Jing Yu, Ping Jiang, Shanyan Lin, Elise Choe and Don E. Davis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Child and Family Studies, International Journal of Psychology, Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, Technovation and Substance Use & Misuse.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact