Yan Fu

752 citations
42 papers · 502 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Yan Fu

40 papers receiving 489 citations

Peers

Yan Fu
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Genetics 97
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 82
  • Health Informatics 5
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 73
  • Rehabilitation 23
Replace Juan J. Fuertes with:
Juan J. Fuertes Spain
Chia‐Chun Tsai Taiwan
Zhigang Mao China
Jeong Geun Kim South Korea
Jin Liu China
António H. J. Moreira Portugal
Suling Xu China
Xiaohan Hao China
Bing Jiang China
Özgur Güler United States
Yan Fu relative to Juan J. Fuertes Spain Juan J. Fuertes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Juan J. Fuertes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Yan Fu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Yan Fu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Yan Fu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Yan Fu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Yan Fu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Yan Fu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Yan Fu. The network helps show where Yan Fu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Yan Fu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Yan Fu Line = papers co-authored together Yan Fu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014134
2 202177
3 202028
4 201922
5 201922
6 202220
7 200819
8 202018
9 201616
10 202116
11 202012
12 201810
13 201710
14 20219
15 20169
16 20228
17 20188
18 20166
19 20216
20 20206

About Yan Fu

Yan Fu is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Control and Systems Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 42 papers that have together received 502 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Energy Efficiency and Management (4 papers), Robot Manipulation and Learning (4 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (4 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (3 papers), Advanced Neural Network Applications (3 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers), Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (3 papers) and AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (97 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (82 citations), Health Informatics (5 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (73 citations) and Rehabilitation (23 citations). Yan Fu has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ming Gong, Linjun Shou, Daxin Jiang, Fei Yuan, Jian Pei, David A. Reardon, William Shapiro, Warren Mason, Surasak Phuphanich and Sven Wind. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Access, Engineering Failure Analysis, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Applied Sciences and International Journal of Simulation Modelling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact