Engineering Failure Analysis

8.6k papers and 136.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 8.6k papers published in Engineering Failure Analysis in the last decades have received a total of 136.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Engineering Failure Analysis usually cover Mechanical Engineering (5.0k papers), Mechanics of Materials (3.7k papers) and Civil and Structural Engineering (2.7k papers) specifically the topics of Fatigue and fracture mechanics (1.6k papers), Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals (1.2k papers) and Mechanical Failure Analysis and Simulation (962 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Engineering Failure Analysis are C.R.F. Azevedo, Colin Gagg, Marco Valente, Gabriele Milani, Lucjan Witek, Yimin Shao, Zaigang Chen, Ricardo Manuel Arias Velásquez, Anand Parey and Hui Ma.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Engineering Failure Analysis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Engineering Failure Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Engineering Failure Analysis.

Countries where authors publish in Engineering Failure Analysis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Engineering Failure Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Engineering Failure Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Engineering Failure Analysis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025