Ya‐Lan Wei

428 citations
28 papers · 307 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Ya‐Lan Wei

27 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers

Ya‐Lan Wei
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Cell Biology 136
  • Reproductive Medicine 53
  • Physiology 12
  • Molecular Biology 154
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 54
Replace Jitu W. George with:
Jitu W. George United States
Masamichi Doiguchi Japan
Fang-Zhen Sun China
Tie‐Gang Meng China
Takuji Yoshimura Japan
Junshun Fang China
Amandine Vanhoutteghem France
Mariko Yamane Japan
Feikun Yang United States
Leif Christopher Lindeman Norway
Ya‐Lan Wei relative to Jitu W. George United States Jitu W. George's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
Jitu W. George · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ya‐Lan Wei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ya‐Lan Wei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ya‐Lan Wei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ya‐Lan Wei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ya‐Lan Wei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ya‐Lan Wei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ya‐Lan Wei. The network helps show where Ya‐Lan Wei may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ya‐Lan Wei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ya‐Lan Wei Line = papers co-authored together Ya‐Lan Wei links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201849
2 201931
3 201928
4 202222
5 202021
6 201917
7 201916
8 202015
9 202015
10 202411
11 202010
12 20229
13 20248
14 20247
15 20197
16 20206
17 20206
18 20236
19 20225
20 20224

About Ya‐Lan Wei

Ya‐Lan Wei is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 28 papers that have together received 307 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (21 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (6 papers), Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases (6 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (5 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (4 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (4 papers), Nuclear Structure and Function (3 papers) and Sperm and Testicular Function (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (136 citations), Reproductive Medicine (53 citations), Physiology (12 citations), Molecular Biology (154 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (54 citations). Ya‐Lan Wei has collaborated with scholars based in China and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Wan-Xi Yang, Zhen‐Yu She, Lin Yang, Minghui Lu, Kai‐Wei Yu, Xinrui Wang, Yueling Li, Tamás Kovács, Jie Chen and Chenjie Xu. Their work appears in journals such as Gene, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research, Chromosoma, Cell and Tissue Research and Experimental Cell Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact