Xing‐Da Ju

679 citations
32 papers · 425 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Xing‐Da Ju

27 papers receiving 419 citations

Peers

Xing‐Da Ju
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Business and International Management 16
  • Developmental Neuroscience 22
  • Molecular Biology 219
  • Aging 5
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 46
Replace Evan Geller with:
Evan Geller United States
Xiaotong Zhang China
Lisa M. Galli United States
Masahito Tachibana Japan
Shane McMahon United States
Katherine W. Saylor United States
Guillermo Palchik United States
Sherry Lin United States
Hua Chang United States
Zhanyang Wang China
Xing‐Da Ju relative to Evan Geller United States Evan Geller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Evan Geller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xing‐Da Ju

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xing‐Da Ju's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xing‐Da Ju with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xing‐Da Ju more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xing‐Da Ju

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xing‐Da Ju. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xing‐Da Ju. The network helps show where Xing‐Da Ju may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xing‐Da Ju, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xing‐Da Ju Line = papers co-authored together Xing‐Da Ju links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016116
2 201867
3 202342
4 201224
5 201524
6 201221
7 201320
8 201717
9 202314
10 202413
11 202212
12 20249
13 20179
14 20238
15 20245
16 20244
17 20244
18 20064
19 20253
20 20242

About Xing‐Da Ju

Xing‐Da Ju is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Communication and Social Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Misinformation and Its Impacts (6 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (5 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (3 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (2 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (2 papers), Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (2 papers) and Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (16 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (22 citations), Molecular Biology (219 citations), Aging (5 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (46 citations). Xing‐Da Ju has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Zhong Sheng Sun, Yan Wang, Huiqian Chen, Chang Lu, Chao Bi, Xiaojuan Zhu, Mingxiang Xu, Jing Xu, Hua‐Li Yu and Ye Guo. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Cerebral Cortex, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Journal of Cellular Biochemistry and BMC Genomics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact