Xin Wen

1.4k citations
57 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Xin Wen

50 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Xin Wen
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 202
  • Human-Computer Interaction 79
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 245
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 193
  • Media Technology 65
Replace Achintya K. Bhowmik with:
Achintya K. Bhowmik United States
Susan Hackwood United States
Guangya Zhou Singapore
Chien‐Hung Chen Taiwan
Xiaohao Wang China
Yoshio Mita Japan
Lipu Zhou China
Jiazhong Chen China
Mingchun Li China
Xin Wen relative to Achintya K. Bhowmik United States Achintya K. Bhowmik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.3×
Achintya K. Bhowmik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xin Wen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xin Wen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xin Wen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xin Wen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xin Wen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xin Wen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xin Wen. The network helps show where Xin Wen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xin Wen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xin Wen Line = papers co-authored together Xin Wen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992157
2 2022117
3 198996
4 202078
5 198751
6 201647
7 202046
8 202241
9 201840
10 202037
11 202333
12 199029
13 202427
14 199222
15 201720
16 199120
17 201816
18 202115
19 201614
20 201913

About Xin Wen

Xin Wen is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Human-Computer Interaction, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Media Technology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection (14 papers), Optical measurement and interference techniques (12 papers), Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (9 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (6 papers), Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements (6 papers), Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (5 papers), Image Processing Techniques and Applications (5 papers) and Advanced Vision and Imaging (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (202 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (79 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (245 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (193 citations) and Media Technology (65 citations). Xin Wen has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Kechen Song, Robert B. Meyer, Yu He, Yunhui Yan, Donald L. D. Caspar, Stefanie Mueller, Etsuo Kokufuta, Yong Li, Mehran Kardar and Toyoichi Tanaka. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Sciences, Physical Review Letters, Sensors, Optics and Lasers in Engineering and Physical Review A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact