Xiaoping Du

64 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Xiaoping Du
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Global and Planetary Change 293
  • Media Technology 97
  • Ecology 261
  • Environmental Engineering 141
  • Analytical Chemistry 92
Replace Masahiko Nagai with:
Masahiko Nagai Japan
Elizabeth Botha Australia
Shuqing Zhang China
Kai Jia China
Lionel Bombrun France
Xiuwan Chen China
Frank Boochs Germany
Ioannis Papoutsis Greece
Nicolas Longépé Italy
Xiangtao Fan China
Xiaoping Du relative to Masahiko Nagai Japan Masahiko Nagai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Masahiko Nagai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiaoping Du

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaoping Du's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaoping Du with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaoping Du more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaoping Du

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaoping Du. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaoping Du. The network helps show where Xiaoping Du may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiaoping Du, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiaoping Du Line = papers co-authored together Xiaoping Du links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021135
2 201373
3 202073
4 202172
5 202066
6 202053
7 202147
8 202244
9 202041
10 201536
11 201735
12 201834
13 201926
14 201925
15 202225
16 201522
17 201422
18 201521
19 202417
20 202217

About Xiaoping Du

Xiaoping Du is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Ecology, Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change and Media Technology, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Remote Sensing in Agriculture (14 papers), Remote-Sensing Image Classification (10 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (7 papers), Remote Sensing and Land Use (5 papers), Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption (5 papers), Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (5 papers), Advanced Image Fusion Techniques (4 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (293 citations), Media Technology (97 citations), Ecology (261 citations), Environmental Engineering (141 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (92 citations). Xiaoping Du has collaborated with scholars based in China, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Zhengjun Liu, Chen Xu, Xiangtao Fan, Zhenzhen Yan, Linyi Liu, Yingying Dong, Wenjiang Huang, Huiqin Ma, Komali Kantamaneni and Junjie Zhu. Their work appears in journals such as Remote Sensing, International Journal of Digital Earth, Optics and Lasers in Engineering, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation and IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact