Xiaoni Wang

1.5k citations
60 papers · 1.2k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Xiaoni Wang

57 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Xiaoni Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 421
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 249
  • Spectroscopy 121
  • Biochemistry 40
  • Neurology 25
Replace Hiroko Itoh with:
Hiroko Itoh Japan
Man Kam Chan United Kingdom
Jukka Vidgren Finland
Philip A. Hipskind United States
Kent E. Jardemark Sweden
Hendrik Mandelkow United States
Michael J. Knight United Kingdom
Rodney Pearlman United States
Xiaoni Wang relative to Hiroko Itoh Japan Hiroko Itoh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
Hiroko Itoh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiaoni Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaoni Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaoni Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaoni Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaoni Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaoni Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaoni Wang. The network helps show where Xiaoni Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiaoni Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiaoni Wang Line = papers co-authored together Xiaoni Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017109
2 201694
3 201582
4 201982
5 201778
6 202165
7 202246
8 202438
9 201937
10 201936
11 201936
12 201933
13 201931
14 202130
15 202023
16 202023
17 202022
18 201921
19 201719
20 202018

About Xiaoni Wang

Xiaoni Wang is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Spectroscopy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Condensed Matter Physics and Information Systems, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (18 papers), Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (7 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (4 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers), Gut microbiota and health (3 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (2 papers) and Network Security and Intrusion Detection (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (421 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (249 citations), Spectroscopy (121 citations), Biochemistry (40 citations) and Neurology (25 citations). Xiaoni Wang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ying Han, Yujing Zuo, Can Sheng, Weiying Lin, Yu Sun, Zhiming Gou, Ni Shu, Xiaochen Hu, Xuanyu Li and Tengda Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, Chemical Science, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience and Alzheimer s & Dementia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact