Xiao-Meng Wang

562 citations
14 papers · 356 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Xiao-Meng Wang

11 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers

Xiao-Meng Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Clinical Psychology 198
  • Applied Psychology 31
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 41
  • General Dentistry 4
  • Social Psychology 52
Replace Helal Uddin Ahmed with:
Helal Uddin Ahmed Bangladesh
Natallia Khamenka Belarus
Ghada Mohammad Abdelwahab Jordan
Abid Hasan Khan Bangladesh
Elizabeth Jiménez-Puig Cuba
Dan Anderson‐Luxford Australia
Rasha Abuthawabeh Jordan
Mehmet Sinan Aydın Türkiye
Zoylen Fernández-Fleites Cuba
Ivan Jakovljević Croatia
Xiao-Meng Wang relative to Helal Uddin Ahmed Bangladesh Helal Uddin Ahmed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Helal Uddin Ahmed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiao-Meng Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiao-Meng Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiao-Meng Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiao-Meng Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiao-Meng Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiao-Meng Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiao-Meng Wang. The network helps show where Xiao-Meng Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiao-Meng Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiao-Meng Wang Line = papers co-authored together Xiao-Meng Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2020260
2 202438
3 202030
4 202012
5 20245
6 20255
7 20252
8 20251
9 20251
10 20241
11 20241
12 20250
13 20240
14 20250

About Xiao-Meng Wang

Xiao-Meng Wang is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 14 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (1 paper), Sodium Intake and Health (1 paper), Frailty in Older Adults (1 paper), Air Quality and Health Impacts (1 paper), Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting (1 paper), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (1 paper) and Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (198 citations), Applied Psychology (31 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (41 citations), General Dentistry (4 citations) and Social Psychology (52 citations). Xiao-Meng Wang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Chen Mao, Wei-Qi Song, Zhihao Li, Dong Shen, Pei‐Liang Chen, Xi-Ru Zhang, Xian-Bo Wu, Wen-Fang Zhong, Jin Yang and Jiahao Xie. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, Experimental Gerontology, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Maturitas and Cardiovascular Diabetology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact