Xiaofeng Cheng

683 citations
54 papers · 467 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Xiaofeng Cheng

48 papers receiving 460 citations

Peers

Xiaofeng Cheng
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Dermatology 44
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 46
  • Mechanics of Materials 93
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 29
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 110
Replace Feng Qin with:
Feng Qin China
M. Tateyama Japan
Liang Deng China
Bin Luo China
Zijing Liu China
Weibing Tang China
Qianlin Song China
Seong-Ho Han South Korea
Lu Deng China
Wenhui Li China
Xiaofeng Cheng relative to Feng Qin China Feng Qin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.6×
Feng Qin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiaofeng Cheng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaofeng Cheng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaofeng Cheng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaofeng Cheng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaofeng Cheng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaofeng Cheng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaofeng Cheng. The network helps show where Xiaofeng Cheng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiaofeng Cheng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiaofeng Cheng Line = papers co-authored together Xiaofeng Cheng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201752
2 201744
3 201339
4 201930
5 202228
6 202424
7 202218
8 200717
9 202117
10 202314
11 201413
12 202313
13 202311
14 201111
15 202111
16 202110
17 20219
18 20227
19 20246
20 20206

About Xiaofeng Cheng

Xiaofeng Cheng is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Mechanics of Materials and Surgery, having authored 54 papers that have together received 467 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rock Mechanics and Modeling (10 papers), Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis (8 papers), Landslides and related hazards (7 papers), Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering (5 papers), Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (5 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (4 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (4 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (44 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (46 citations), Mechanics of Materials (93 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (29 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (110 citations). Xiaofeng Cheng has collaborated with scholars based in China, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Бо Лі, Chun’an Tang, Hongdong Song, Chengtao Wang, Yifu Liu, Xiaochen Zhou, C.A. Tang, Hai Pu, G. Li and Yujun Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Computers and Geotechnics, BMC Cancer, BMC Urology, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering and Food & Function.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact