Computers and Geotechnics

6.0k papers and 149.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.0k papers published in Computers and Geotechnics in the last decades have received a total of 149.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Computers and Geotechnics usually cover Civil and Structural Engineering (4.8k papers), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (1.9k papers) and Mechanics of Materials (1.7k papers) specifically the topics of Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures (2.6k papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis (1.9k papers) and Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics (1.8k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Computers and Geotechnics are Daichao Sheng, Scott W. Sloan, Lyesse Laloui, Mingjing Jiang, Anthony T.C. Goh, Jinsong Huang, Y.M. Cheng, A. V. Lyamin, Jidong Zhao and Wencheng Wei.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Computers and Geotechnics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Computers and Geotechnics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Computers and Geotechnics.

Countries where authors publish in Computers and Geotechnics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Computers and Geotechnics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Computers and Geotechnics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computers and Geotechnics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025