Xiaofei Yang

783 citations
22 papers · 589 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Xiaofei Yang

19 papers receiving 573 citations

Peers

Xiaofei Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 361
  • Condensed Matter Physics 126
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 147
  • Artificial Intelligence 111
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 61
Replace Harkirat Singh with:
Harkirat Singh India
Yu He China
Kôtarô Tanahashi Japan
Windsor Hsu United States
Michael F. Gunther Germany
Yuanyuan Guo China
Chunlei Zhang China
Haowen Hou China
Xiaofei Yang relative to Harkirat Singh India Harkirat Singh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
Harkirat Singh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiaofei Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaofei Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaofei Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaofei Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaofei Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaofei Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaofei Yang. The network helps show where Xiaofei Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiaofei Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiaofei Yang Line = papers co-authored together Xiaofei Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018252
2 201547
3 201946
4 201846
5 202130
6 201926
7 202124
8 201722
9 201920
10 202215
11 201515
12 202414
13 202013
14 20247
15 20184
16 20243
17 20242
18 20212
19 20241
20 20240

About Xiaofei Yang

Xiaofei Yang is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 22 papers that have together received 589 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (6 papers), Text and Document Classification Technologies (5 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (4 papers), Face and Expression Recognition (4 papers), Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research (4 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (3 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (3 papers) and Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (361 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (126 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (147 citations), Artificial Intelligence (111 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (61 citations). Xiaofei Yang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Yue Zhang, Long You, Shijiang Luo, Xuecheng Zou, Min Suk Song, Nuo Xu, Jeongmin Hong, Jinjun Ding, William Zhu and Tao Zhu. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Intelligence, Neurocomputing, Applied Physics Letters, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics and Journal of Physics D Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact