W.W. Pitt

858 citations
36 papers · 670 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

    • Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 18
    • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies 3
    • Protein purification and stability 3

W.W. Pitt

35 papers receiving 562 citations

Peers

W.W. Pitt
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Spectroscopy 252
  • Analytical Chemistry 110
  • Filtration and Separation 21
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 37
  • Biomedical Engineering 167
Replace Parijat Jain with:
Parijat Jain United States
G. Vaccari Italy
Prafulla Kumar Sahu India
Paulo Clairmont Feitosa de Lima Gomes Brazil
A. Trifirò Italy
Donald L. Simmons United States
Paal Molander Norway
John D. Naworal United States
Stephen J. Swarin United States
D. Giacosa Italy
W.W. Pitt relative to Parijat Jain United States Parijat Jain's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Parijat Jain · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W.W. Pitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W.W. Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.W. Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.W. Pitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W.W. Pitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.W. Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.W. Pitt. The network helps show where W.W. Pitt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside W.W. Pitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W.W. Pitt Line = papers co-authored together W.W. Pitt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005124
2 198371
3 197446
4 199645
5 197235
6 197431
7 197029
8 197328
9
A small, automated high-resolution analyzer for detemination of carbohydrates in body fluids.
197125
10 197124
11 197522
12 197320
13 198318
14 198115
15 197614
16 197213
17 196913
18 197513
19 197013
20 197311

About W.W. Pitt

W.W. Pitt is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Molecular Biology, Analytical Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering, having authored 36 papers that have together received 670 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (18 papers), Chromatography in Natural Products (5 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (4 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (4 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (3 papers), Protein purification and stability (3 papers) and Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (252 citations), Analytical Chemistry (110 citations), Filtration and Separation (21 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (37 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (167 citations). W.W. Pitt has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Sidney Katz, Charles D. Scott, Stanley R Dinsmore, Richard A. Robison, G. Bruce Schaalje, B. L. Roeder, John C. Carmen, J. F. Nelson, Hans Veening and R.L. Jolley. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chromatography A, Clinical Chemistry, Journal of Chromatographic Science, Analytical Biochemistry and Analytical Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact