W.P.M.A. Lamers
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
-
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Papers in
-
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology 4
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 2
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research 2
-
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 3
- Ocular Oncology and Treatments 2
- Co-authors
- Jan Klooster (8 shared papers)Henny J. M. Beckers (6 shared papers)Gijs F.J.M. Vrensen (5 shared papers)J.J.L. van der Want (3 shared papers)M.P.M. ten Tusscher (2 shared papers)Gabriël van Rij (1 shared paper)J.A. Oosterhuis (1 shared paper)J. Versteeg (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Ophthalmologica (4 papers)Brain Research (3 papers)Ophthalmic Research (3 papers)Documenta Ophthalmologica (2 papers)British Journal of Ophthalmology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Netherlands
In The Last Decade
W.P.M.A. Lamers
15 papers receiving 270 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Ophthalmology 99
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 104
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 33
- Sensory Systems 23
- Physiology 64
Countries citing papers authored by W.P.M.A. Lamers
This map shows the geographic impact of W.P.M.A. Lamers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.P.M.A. Lamers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.P.M.A. Lamers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W.P.M.A. Lamers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.P.M.A. Lamers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.P.M.A. Lamers. The network helps show where W.P.M.A. Lamers may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside W.P.M.A. Lamers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1989 | 51 | |
| 2 | 1982 | 39 | |
| 3 | 1993 | 34 | |
| 4 | 1989 | 29 | |
| 5 | Ultrastructural identification of trigeminal nerve endings in the rat cornea and iris. | 1992 | 25 |
| 6 | 1991 | 22 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 21 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 18 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 12 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 10 | |
| 11 | 1963 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1988 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1964 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1972 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1962 | 1 |
About W.P.M.A. Lamers
W.P.M.A. Lamers is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology, Physiology and Surgery, having authored 16 papers that have together received 282 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (3 papers), Ocular Oncology and Treatments (2 papers), Connexins and lens biology (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Neurological Disorders and Treatments (2 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (99 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (104 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (33 citations), Sensory Systems (23 citations) and Physiology (64 citations). W.P.M.A. Lamers has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jan Klooster, Henny J. M. Beckers, Gijs F.J.M. Vrensen, J.J.L. van der Want, M.P.M. ten Tusscher, Gabriël van Rij, J.A. Oosterhuis, J. Versteeg, P. Hupperets and A. Twijnstra. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmologica, Brain Research, Ophthalmic Research, Documenta Ophthalmologica and British Journal of Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.