Wouter van Gent

1.4k citations
48 papers · 977 · h-index 20

Impact in

  • Urban Studies top 0.2%
    • Urban Planning and Governance
    • Urbanization and City Planning
  • Finance top 2%
    • Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism

Papers in

Wouter van Gent

45 papers receiving 914 citations

Peers

Wouter van Gent
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Urban Studies 428
  • Finance 348
  • Transportation 106
  • Sociology and Political Science 532
  • Economics and Econometrics 241
Replace Kathe Newman with:
Kathe Newman United States
R. Alan Walks Canada
Christian Kesteloot Belgium
Cody Hochstenbach Netherlands
Wim Ostendorf Netherlands
Michael Janoschka Spain
Derek Hyra United States
Jan van Weesep Netherlands
Edmond Préteceille France
Guy Baeten Sweden
Wouter van Gent relative to Kathe Newman United States Kathe Newman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Kathe Newman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wouter van Gent

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wouter van Gent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wouter van Gent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wouter van Gent more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wouter van Gent

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wouter van Gent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wouter van Gent. The network helps show where Wouter van Gent may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Wouter van Gent, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wouter van Gent Line = papers co-authored together Wouter van Gent links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012100
2 200974
3 201467
4 201365
5 201562
6 201559
7 201456
8 201954
9 201636
10 200933
11 201733
12 201932
13 201028
14 201627
15 201626
16 201926
17 201224
18 201024
19 201820
20 201620

About Wouter van Gent

Wouter van Gent is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Finance, Urban Studies, Education and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 48 papers that have together received 977 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (21 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (18 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (13 papers), Urbanization and City Planning (7 papers), Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (6 papers), Housing Market and Economics (6 papers), Rural development and sustainability (5 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (428 citations), Finance (348 citations), Transportation (106 citations), Sociology and Political Science (532 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (241 citations). Wouter van Gent has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include S. Musterd, Cody Hochstenbach, Willem Boterman, Wim Ostendorf, Marjolijn Das, Justus Uitermark, Federico Savini, Stan Majoor, Nick Bailey and Gwilym Pryce. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, Urban Studies, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, International Journal of Housing Policy and Housing Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact