Wouter van Furth
Impact in
- Otorhinolaryngology top 10%
- Sinusitis and nasal conditions
-
- Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
Papers in
- Surgery 8
- Head and Neck Surgical Oncology 5
-
- Meningioma and schwannoma management 6
- Co-authors
- Christos Georgalas (5 shared papers)Shin Jung (1 shared paper)Sherri-Lynn Hubbard (1 shared paper)Bodour Salhia (1 shared paper)Yasuhiko Akiyama (1 shared paper)Michael D. Taylor (1 shared paper)James T. Rutka (1 shared paper)Todd G. Mainprize (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Rhinology Journal (2 papers)Neuro-Oncology (2 papers)Frontiers in Oncology (1 paper)British Journal of Ophthalmology (1 paper)Oncology Reports (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsItalyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Wouter van Furth
10 papers receiving 269 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Otorhinolaryngology 39
- Neurology 71
- Immunology and Allergy 24
- Cell Biology 60
- Surgery 138
Countries citing papers authored by Wouter van Furth
This map shows the geographic impact of Wouter van Furth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wouter van Furth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wouter van Furth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wouter van Furth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wouter van Furth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wouter van Furth. The network helps show where Wouter van Furth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wouter van Furth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 112 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 41 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 0 |
About Wouter van Furth
Wouter van Furth is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Neurology and Molecular Biology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 274 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meningioma and schwannoma management (6 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (5 papers), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (4 papers), Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments (2 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (1 paper), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (1 paper) and Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (39 citations), Neurology (71 citations), Immunology and Allergy (24 citations), Cell Biology (60 citations) and Surgery (138 citations). Wouter van Furth has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christos Georgalas, Shin Jung, Sherri-Lynn Hubbard, Bodour Salhia, Yasuhiko Akiyama, Michael D. Taylor, James T. Rutka, Todd G. Mainprize, Wytske J. Fokkens and S.M. Reinartz. Their work appears in journals such as Rhinology Journal, Neuro-Oncology, Frontiers in Oncology, British Journal of Ophthalmology and Oncology Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.