Wouter van den Bos

96 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Peers

Wouter van den Bos
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • General Decision Sciences 437
  • Applied Psychology 437
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.7k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 844
  • Social Psychology 1.0k
Replace Rongjun Yu with:
Rongjun Yu China
Brooks King‐Casas United States
Amitai Shenhav United States
Johannes Hewig Germany
Bernd Figner Netherlands
A. Ross Otto Canada
Peter Sokol‐Hessner United States
Jason Chein United States
Xiaolin Zhou China
Luke J. Chang United States
Wouter van den Bos relative to Rongjun Yu China Rongjun Yu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Rongjun Yu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wouter van den Bos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wouter van den Bos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wouter van den Bos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wouter van den Bos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wouter van den Bos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wouter van den Bos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wouter van den Bos. The network helps show where Wouter van den Bos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wouter van den Bos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wouter van den Bos Line = papers co-authored together Wouter van den Bos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011198
2 2010180
3 2015176
4 2014139
5 2011135
6 2009133
7 2009130
8 2010128
9 2017119
10 2014113
11 2020105
12 201999
13 201298
14 202198
15 201795
16 200995
17 200780
18 202178
19 201478
20 201675

About Wouter van den Bos

Wouter van den Bos is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 101 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (27 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (15 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (12 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (12 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (12 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (11 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (10 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (437 citations), Applied Psychology (437 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.7k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (844 citations) and Social Psychology (1.0k citations). Wouter van den Bos has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Eveline A. Crone, Samuel M. McClure, Berna Güroğlu, Serge A.R.B. Rombouts, Simon Ciranka, Julie B. Schweitzer, Eric van Dijk, Michiel Westenberg, Christian A. Rodriguez and Ralph Hertwig. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Scientific Reports, Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and Cerebral Cortex.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact