Wouter De Vos
Impact in
-
- Genetic diversity and population structure
- Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
- Animal Genetics and Reproduction
- Physiology top 10%
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Yves Van de Peer (1 shared paper)John S. Taylor (1 shared paper)Klaas Vandepoele (1 shared paper)Axel Meyer (1 shared paper)Emmanuel Vander Poorten (1 shared paper)Elke Van de Casteele (2 shared papers)Tim Van den Wyngaert (1 shared paper)John Dickson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- EJNMMI Physics (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Health Science Reports (1 paper)eSpace (Curtin University) (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
Wouter De Vos
5 papers receiving 432 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Genetics 161
- Physiology 26
- Molecular Biology 299
- Plant Science 129
- Aquatic Science 25
Countries citing papers authored by Wouter De Vos
This map shows the geographic impact of Wouter De Vos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wouter De Vos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wouter De Vos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wouter De Vos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wouter De Vos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wouter De Vos. The network helps show where Wouter De Vos may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Wouter De Vos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 437 | |
| 2 | Judicial Activism gives recognition to a general class action in South Africa | 2013 | 2 |
| 3 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 4 | Herbstein and Van Winsen : The Civil Practice of the High Courts & Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa, A.C. Cillliers, C. Loot & H.C. Nel : book review | 2010 | 1 |
| 5 | Essays in honour of Ben Beinart | 1978 | 1 |
| 6 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2025 | 0 |
About Wouter De Vos
Wouter De Vos is a scholar working on Law, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Oncology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Comparative and International Law Studies (2 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (2 papers), Soft Robotics and Applications (1 paper), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Dental Radiography and Imaging (1 paper), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (1 paper), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Augmented Reality Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (161 citations), Physiology (26 citations), Molecular Biology (299 citations), Plant Science (129 citations) and Aquatic Science (25 citations). Wouter De Vos has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Yves Van de Peer, John S. Taylor, Klaas Vandepoele, Axel Meyer, Emmanuel Vander Poorten, Elke Van de Casteele, Tim Van den Wyngaert, John Dickson and Carlos Rodriguez‐Guerrero. Their work appears in journals such as EJNMMI Physics, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Health Science Reports and eSpace (Curtin University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.