W.M. Webster
Impact in
- Virology top 10%
- Poxvirus research and outbreaks
- Small Animals top 10%
Papers in
-
- Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research 11
- Genetics 9
- Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research 4
- Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology 4
- Co-authors
- Stephen F. Little (7 shared papers)Gerard P. Andrews (5 shared papers)Sarah L. Norris (5 shared papers)Bruce E. Ivins (4 shared papers)Patricia Fellows (2 shared papers)Diana Fisher (2 shared papers)M. Louise M. Pitt (1 shared paper)S F Little (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Vaccine (4 papers)New Zealand Veterinary Journal (4 papers)Biologicals (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)Veterinary Record (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNew ZealandGeorgia
In The Last Decade
W.M. Webster
19 papers receiving 290 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Virology 37
- Small Animals 35
- Infectious Diseases 85
- Biotechnology 37
- Parasitology 26
Countries citing papers authored by W.M. Webster
This map shows the geographic impact of W.M. Webster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.M. Webster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.M. Webster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W.M. Webster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.M. Webster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.M. Webster. The network helps show where W.M. Webster may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside W.M. Webster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 42 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 28 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 26 | |
| 5 | 1966 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 19 | |
| 9 | 1955 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 13 | 1967 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1957 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 18 | New evidence on the regurgitation mechanism. | 1957 | 2 |
| 19 | 1958 | 1 |
About W.M. Webster
W.M. Webster is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Parasitology, Infectious Diseases and Virology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 308 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research (11 papers), Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (4 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (4 papers), Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research (3 papers), Poxvirus research and outbreaks (2 papers), Leptospirosis research and findings (2 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (2 papers) and Pasture and Agricultural Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (37 citations), Small Animals (35 citations), Infectious Diseases (85 citations), Biotechnology (37 citations) and Parasitology (26 citations). W.M. Webster has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Georgia. Frequent co-authors include Stephen F. Little, Gerard P. Andrews, Sarah L. Norris, Bruce E. Ivins, Patricia Fellows, Diana Fisher, M. Louise M. Pitt, S F Little, Jeffrey J. Adamovicz and Bradford S. Powell. Their work appears in journals such as Vaccine, New Zealand Veterinary Journal, Biologicals, PLoS ONE and Veterinary Record.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.