W.J. Caspers

785 citations
58 papers · 664 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

W.J. Caspers

56 papers receiving 623 citations

Peers

W.J. Caspers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Condensed Matter Physics 382
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 285
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 84
  • Biophysics 34
  • Spectroscopy 66
Replace George Whitfield with:
George Whitfield United States
Douglas G. Stinson United States
T. Kohmoto Japan
J R Fletcher United Kingdom
J.H.P. Colpa Netherlands
Michael W. Klein United States
J.M. Delrieu France
James L. Black United States
Thomas R. Carver United States
D. Scalbert France
W.J. Caspers relative to George Whitfield United States George Whitfield's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.5×
George Whitfield · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W.J. Caspers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W.J. Caspers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.J. Caspers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.J. Caspers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W.J. Caspers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.J. Caspers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.J. Caspers. The network helps show where W.J. Caspers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside W.J. Caspers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W.J. Caspers Line = papers co-authored together W.J. Caspers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198740
2 198439
3 198238
4 196436
5 197936
6 198934
7 196432
8 198932
9 196026
10 196425
11 198218
12 195917
13 196017
14 197715
15 198314
16 198614
17 196813
18 198013
19 196612
20 196912

About W.J. Caspers

W.J. Caspers is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mathematical Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Spectroscopy, having authored 58 papers that have together received 664 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (27 papers), Quantum many-body systems (21 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (18 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (13 papers), Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (6 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (4 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (4 papers) and Magnetism in coordination complexes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (382 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (285 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (84 citations), Biophysics (34 citations) and Spectroscopy (66 citations). W.J. Caspers has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Poland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Wim Magnus, Willem van der Lugt, Ger Vertogen, Tadeusz Lulek, Paul Johann Gellings, F.W. Wiegel, Harold J. W. Zandvliet, A. van Silfhout, Folkert van der Woude and J. Leo van Hemmen. Their work appears in journals such as Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Physics Letters A, physica status solidi (b), Journal of Statistical Physics and Solid State Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact