Wing-tsit Chan

2.4k citations
82 papers · 1.3k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Wing-tsit Chan

63 papers receiving 818 citations

Peers

Wing-tsit Chan
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Cultural Studies 227
  • Religious studies 118
  • Sociology and Political Science 837
  • Philosophy 151
  • Anthropology 107
Replace Derk Bodde with:
Derk Bodde United States
Burton Watson United States
Wm. Theodore de Bary
Jane Tompkins United States
Harry Zohn
Leo Spitzer United States
Ralph Flores
Ann Douglas United States
Susan Gubar United States
Thomas Stearns Eliot United States
Wing-tsit Chan relative to Derk Bodde United States Derk Bodde's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Derk Bodde · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wing-tsit Chan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wing-tsit Chan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wing-tsit Chan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wing-tsit Chan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wing-tsit Chan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wing-tsit Chan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wing-tsit Chan. The network helps show where Wing-tsit Chan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wing-tsit Chan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wing-tsit Chan Line = papers co-authored together Wing-tsit Chan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1964213
2 1960188
3 1954107
4 1964100
5 195563
6 195161
7
Instructions for Practical Living and Other Neo-Confucian Writings
198542
8
The Way of Lao Tzu
196340
9 199435
10 197532
11 197032
12 198927
13 198827
14 196326
15
The way of Lao Tzu (Tao-tê ching)
196321
16 195918
17 197018
18 196417
19
Reflections on Things at Hand the Neo-Confucian Anthology, Compiled by Chu Hsi and Lü Tsu-Ch'ien. Translated, with Notes by Wing-Tsit Chan. --
196717
20 196717

About Wing-tsit Chan

Wing-tsit Chan is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Religious studies, Philosophy and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 82 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (45 papers), Japanese History and Culture (6 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (4 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (3 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (2 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (2 papers) and Asian Studies and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (227 citations), Religious studies (118 citations), Sociology and Political Science (837 citations), Philosophy (151 citations) and Anthropology (107 citations). Wing-tsit Chan has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Fung Yu-lan, Derk Bodde, Burton Watson, Leon Hurvitz, Wm. Theodore de Bary, Chester C. Tan, John Meskill, Tung-tsu Chu, Kirill Ole THOMPSON and Hoyt Cleveland Tillman. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy East and West, The Journal of Asian Studies, Artibus Asiae, Pacific Affairs and Journal of the American Oriental Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact