老子

6 papers and 46 indexed citations i.

About

老子 is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Industrial relations and Aerospace Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, 老子 has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 46 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 0 papers in Industrial relations and 0 papers in Aerospace Engineering. Recurrent topics in 老子’s work include Chinese history and philosophy (3 papers) 老子 is often cited by papers focused on Chinese history and philosophy (3 papers) 老子 collaborates with scholars based in and 老子's co-authors include Richard John Lynn, Richard Wilhelm and Archie J. Bahm and has published in prestigious journals such as University of California Press eBooks, Columbia University Press eBooks and Continuum eBooks.

In The Last Decade

Co-authorship network of co-authors of 老子 i

Fields of papers citing papers by 老子

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by 老子. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by 老子. The network helps show where 老子 may publish in the future.

Countries citing papers authored by 老子

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of 老子's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by 老子 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites 老子 more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025