Leon Hurvitz
Impact in
- Religious studies top 2%
- Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Japanese History and Culture
Papers in
-
- Chinese history and philosophy 21
-
- Indian and Buddhist Studies 17
- Co-authors
- Holmes Welch (2 shared papers)Wm. Theodore de Bary (1 shared paper)Derk Bodde (1 shared paper)Tung-tsu Chu (1 shared paper)Burton Watson (1 shared paper)Chester C. Tan (1 shared paper)Wing-tsit Chan (1 shared paper)John Meskill (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Asian Studies (6 papers)Pacific Affairs (5 papers)Artibus Asiae (4 papers)Journal of the American Oriental Society (14 papers)The American Historical Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Leon Hurvitz
31 papers receiving 210 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Religious studies 53
- Cultural Studies 78
- Sociology and Political Science 220
- Anthropology 48
- Philosophy 42
Countries citing papers authored by Leon Hurvitz
This map shows the geographic impact of Leon Hurvitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leon Hurvitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leon Hurvitz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leon Hurvitz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leon Hurvitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leon Hurvitz. The network helps show where Leon Hurvitz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Leon Hurvitz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1960 | 132 | |
| 2 | 1968 | 46 | |
| 3 | 1976 | 34 | |
| 4 | 1960 | 21 | |
| 5 | 1969 | 15 | |
| 6 | 1965 | 9 | |
| 7 | 1969 | 9 | |
| 8 | 1982 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1972 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1961 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1956 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1959 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1958 | 4 | |
| 14 | Scripture of the Lotus blossom of the fine dharma (the Lotus sūtra) | 2009 | 3 |
| 15 | 1976 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1969 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1967 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1970 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1984 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1985 | 2 |
About Leon Hurvitz
Leon Hurvitz is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Religious studies, Anthropology, Cultural Studies and Language and Linguistics, having authored 43 papers that have together received 338 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (21 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (17 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (10 papers), Japanese History and Culture (7 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (2 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (2 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (2 papers) and Medieval and Classical Philosophy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (53 citations), Cultural Studies (78 citations), Sociology and Political Science (220 citations), Anthropology (48 citations) and Philosophy (42 citations). Leon Hurvitz has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Holmes Welch, Wm. Theodore de Bary, Derk Bodde, Tung-tsu Chu, Burton Watson, Chester C. Tan, Wing-tsit Chan, John Meskill, Robert Shih and David W. Chappell. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Asian Studies, Pacific Affairs, Artibus Asiae, Journal of the American Oriental Society and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.