Leon Hurvitz
Impact in
- Religious studies top 2%
- Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Japanese History and Culture
Papers in
-
- Chinese history and philosophy 21
-
- Indian and Buddhist Studies 17
- Co-authors
- Holmes Welch (1 shared paper)John Meskill (1 shared paper)Wing-tsit Chan (1 shared paper)Wm. Theodore de Bary (1 shared paper)Burton Watson (1 shared paper)Tung-tsu Chu (1 shared paper)Derk Bodde (1 shared paper)Chester C. Tan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Asian Studies (7 papers)Pacific Affairs (5 papers)Artibus Asiae (4 papers)Journal of the American Oriental Society (14 papers)Journal of Indian Philosophy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Leon Hurvitz
33 papers receiving 276 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Religious studies 91
- Cultural Studies 104
- Anthropology 90
- Sociology and Political Science 319
- Philosophy 48
Countries citing papers authored by Leon Hurvitz
This map shows the geographic impact of Leon Hurvitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leon Hurvitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leon Hurvitz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leon Hurvitz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leon Hurvitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leon Hurvitz. The network helps show where Leon Hurvitz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Leon Hurvitz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1960 | 195 | |
| 2 | 1968 | 51 | |
| 3 | 1976 | 47 | |
| 4 | 1960 | 37 | |
| 5 | 1969 | 17 | |
| 6 | 1968 | 17 | |
| 7 | 1959 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1965 | 11 | |
| 9 | 1969 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1982 | 6 | |
| 11 | 1972 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1961 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1956 | 5 | |
| 14 | Scripture of the Lotus blossom of the fine dharma (the Lotus sūtra) | 2009 | 4 |
| 15 | 1958 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1984 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1976 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1969 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1958 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1967 | 3 |
About Leon Hurvitz
Leon Hurvitz is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Religious studies, Anthropology, Cultural Studies and Language and Linguistics, having authored 44 papers that have together received 469 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (21 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (17 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (10 papers), Japanese History and Culture (7 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (2 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (2 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (2 papers) and Indian History and Philosophy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (91 citations), Cultural Studies (104 citations), Anthropology (90 citations), Sociology and Political Science (319 citations) and Philosophy (48 citations). Leon Hurvitz has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Holmes Welch, John Meskill, Wing-tsit Chan, Wm. Theodore de Bary, Burton Watson, Tung-tsu Chu, Derk Bodde, Chester C. Tan, Alexander Coburn Soper and Robert Shih. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Asian Studies, Pacific Affairs, Artibus Asiae, Journal of the American Oriental Society and Journal of Indian Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.