Winfried Nöth

87 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Winfried Nöth
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Literature and Literary Theory 218
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 238
  • Communication 134
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 88
  • Language and Linguistics 194
Replace Paul Cobley with:
Paul Cobley United Kingdom
João Queiroz Brazil
Algirdas Julien Greimas Brazil
Albert Séchehaye
Dínda L. Gorlée Norway
Daniel Chandler United Kingdom
Nathan Houser United States
Mary Carruthers United States
Christian J. W. Kloesel United States
Frederik Stjernfelt Denmark
Winfried Nöth relative to Paul Cobley United Kingdom Paul Cobley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Paul Cobley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Winfried Nöth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Winfried Nöth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Winfried Nöth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Winfried Nöth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Winfried Nöth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Winfried Nöth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Winfried Nöth. The network helps show where Winfried Nöth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Winfried Nöth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Winfried Nöth Line = papers co-authored together Winfried Nöth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 113 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990234
2 1996162
3 200094
4 199846
5 200144
6 200141
7 198836
8 200835
9 201132
10 201428
11 199927
12 201023
13 201822
14 201620
15 198520
16 201419
17 200017
18 199716
19 201415
20 200115

About Winfried Nöth

Winfried Nöth is a scholar working on Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics, Communication and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 113 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (19 papers), Semiotics and Representation Studies (17 papers), Linguistic research and analysis (13 papers), Media, Communication, and Education (11 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (11 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (9 papers), Linguistic Education and Pedagogy (9 papers) and Language and cultural evolution (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (218 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (238 citations), Communication (134 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (88 citations) and Language and Linguistics (194 citations). Winfried Nöth has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Germany and Estonia. Frequent co-authors include Kalevi Kull, Andrew Stables, Alin Olteanu, Lucía Santaella, Eero Tarasti, Marek Tamm and Carsten Herrmann‐Pillath. Their work appears in journals such as Semiotica, Sign Systems Studies, Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society, tripleC Communication Capitalism & Critique Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society and International Journal of Cultural Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact