William W. Smith

567 citations
37 papers · 347 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

William W. Smith

36 papers receiving 318 citations

Peers

William W. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
  • Algebra and Number Theory 290
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 52
  • Geometry and Topology 96
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 118
  • Mathematical Physics 24
Replace David E. Rush with:
David E. Rush United States
Jay Shapiro United States
H. H. Brungs Canada
Stefania Gabelli Italy
John A. Beachy United States
James A. Huckaba United States
Ira J. Papick United States
E. R. Puczyłowski Poland
Arun Vinayak Jategaonkar United States
Péter Vámos United Kingdom
William W. Smith relative to David E. Rush United States David E. Rush's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
David E. Rush · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William W. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William W. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William W. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William W. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William W. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William W. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William W. Smith. The network helps show where William W. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside William W. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William W. Smith Line = papers co-authored together William W. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196934
2 199032
3 199329
4 199322
5 199421
6 199920
7 197119
8 198319
9 201115
10 199214
11 200513
12 199311
13 199310
14 19909
15 20088
16 19907
17 19906
18 19946
19 20036
20 19986

About William W. Smith

William W. Smith is a scholar working on Algebra and Number Theory, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics and Organic Chemistry, having authored 37 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rings, Modules, and Algebras (32 papers), semigroups and automata theory (8 papers), Commutative Algebra and Its Applications (6 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (3 papers), Synthesis and pharmacology of benzodiazepine derivatives (3 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (3 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (3 papers) and Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (290 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (52 citations), Geometry and Topology (96 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (118 citations) and Mathematical Physics (24 citations). William W. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Scott T. Chapman, David F. Anderson, Robert Gilmer, Jim Coykendall, D. D. Anderson, David Lantz, William Heinzer, Wolfgang Schmid and Jean-Luc Chabert. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Algebra, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Mathematika, The Ramanujan Journal and Israel Journal of Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact