William Verheul
Impact in
- Family Practice top 10%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Papers in
-
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 5
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 3
-
- Empathy and Medical Education 3
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments 2
- Co-authors
- Jozien M. Bensing (10 shared papers)Sandra van Dulmen (3 shared papers)Elsken van der Wall (1 shared paper)Akke Albada (1 shared paper)Peter Spreeuwenberg (1 shared paper)Liesbeth M. van Vliet (1 shared paper)François Schellevis (2 shared papers)Fred Tromp (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Patient Education and Counseling (3 papers)BMC Family Practice (1 paper)Journal of General Internal Medicine (1 paper)International Journal of Psychophysiology (1 paper)Medical Care (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsNorwaySwitzerland
In The Last Decade
William Verheul
11 papers receiving 475 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Family Practice 15
- General Health Professions 160
- Psychiatry and Mental health 87
- Cognitive Neuroscience 70
- Applied Psychology 12
Countries citing papers authored by William Verheul
This map shows the geographic impact of William Verheul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Verheul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Verheul more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Verheul
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Verheul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Verheul. The network helps show where William Verheul may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside William Verheul, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 111 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 101 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 97 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 80 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 27 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 12 | Wat als burgemeesters het echt voor het zeggen hebben | 2015 | 0 |
About William Verheul
William Verheul is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Family Practice, having authored 12 papers that have together received 500 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (5 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (3 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (3 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (1 paper) and Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (15 citations), General Health Professions (160 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (87 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (70 citations) and Applied Psychology (12 citations). William Verheul has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Norway and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Jozien M. Bensing, Sandra van Dulmen, Elsken van der Wall, Akke Albada, Peter Spreeuwenberg, Liesbeth M. van Vliet, François Schellevis, Fred Tromp, A. van den Brink-Muinen and Arnstein Finset. Their work appears in journals such as Patient Education and Counseling, BMC Family Practice, Journal of General Internal Medicine, International Journal of Psychophysiology and Medical Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.