William T. Lambert
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
- Insect Science top 10%
- Insect and Pesticide Research
Papers in
-
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 3
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis 2
-
- Insect and Pesticide Research 5
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 4
- Co-authors
- Steven D. Burke (3 shared papers)Thomas C. Sparks (3 shared papers)William Roush (2 shared papers)Carla J. R. Klittich (1 shared paper)Zoltán Benkő (1 shared paper)David A. Demeter (1 shared paper)Beth A. Lorsbach (1 shared paper)Yu Zhang (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Pest Management Science (5 papers)Organic Letters (3 papers)The Journal of Organic Chemistry (2 papers)Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William T. Lambert
11 papers receiving 346 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Organic Chemistry 196
- Insect Science 74
- Biotechnology 39
- Biochemistry 24
- Pollution 31
Countries citing papers authored by William T. Lambert
This map shows the geographic impact of William T. Lambert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William T. Lambert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William T. Lambert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William T. Lambert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William T. Lambert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William T. Lambert. The network helps show where William T. Lambert may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside William T. Lambert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 94 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 62 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 45 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 45 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 1 |
About William T. Lambert
William T. Lambert is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Insect Science, Biotechnology, Biochemistry and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 11 papers that have together received 351 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Pesticide Research (5 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (4 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (3 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (3 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (3 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (2 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (2 papers) and Fungal Plant Pathogen Control (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (196 citations), Insect Science (74 citations), Biotechnology (39 citations), Biochemistry (24 citations) and Pollution (31 citations). William T. Lambert has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Steven D. Burke, Thomas C. Sparks, William Roush, Carla J. R. Klittich, Zoltán Benkő, David A. Demeter, Beth A. Lorsbach, Yu Zhang, Joshua A. Roth and Gary D. Crouse. Their work appears in journals such as Pest Management Science, Organic Letters, The Journal of Organic Chemistry and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.