William Stern

4.2k citations
123 papers · 2.5k · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

William Stern

113 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

William Stern
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.8k
  • Plant Science 1.0k
  • Molecular Biology 975
  • General Psychology 18
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 151
Replace I. K. Ferguson with:
I. K. Ferguson United Kingdom
Robert F. Thorne United States
Siwert Nilsson Sweden
Dan H. Nicolson United States
Marccus Alves Brazil
John G. Conran Australia
P.P. Hoen Netherlands
Michael Hesse Austria
Madeline M. Harley United Kingdom
D. F. Cutler United Kingdom
William Stern relative to I. K. Ferguson United Kingdom I. K. Ferguson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
I. K. Ferguson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Stern

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Stern's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Stern with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Stern more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Stern

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Stern. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Stern. The network helps show where William Stern may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Stern, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Stern Line = papers co-authored together William Stern links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 123 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1960172
2 1963127
3 1974117
4 198778
5 198377
6 197362
7 199358
8 198357
9 199154
10 199652
11 198550
12 200247
13 200146
14 199846
15 200645
16 198645
17 198844
18 198343
19 196143
20 199542

About William Stern

William Stern is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 123 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (53 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (40 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (36 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (22 papers), Fern and Epiphyte Biology (14 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (9 papers), Biochemical and biochemical processes (6 papers) and Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.8k citations), Plant Science (1.0k citations), Molecular Biology (975 citations), General Psychology (18 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (151 citations). William Stern has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Alec M. Pridgeon, Walter S. Judd, Richard H. Eyde, Kenneth J. Curry, Barbara S. Carlsward, Ernest M. Gifford, Adriance S. Foster, Michael W. Morris, Joseph Ewan and David H. Benzing. Their work appears in journals such as Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, American Journal of Botany, Taxon, BioScience and Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact