William Speier

90 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

William Speier
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Health Informatics 79
  • Health Information Management 105
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 413
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 361
  • Artificial Intelligence 534
Replace Corey Arnold with:
Corey Arnold United States
Jasjit S. Suri United States
G. Anthony Reina United States
Pieter Kubben Netherlands
Gilles Wainrib France
Fabien Scalzo United States
Ahmad Chaddad Canada
Melissa Berthelot United Kingdom
Sidong Liu Australia
Sofia Ira Ktena United Kingdom
William Speier relative to Corey Arnold United States Corey Arnold's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Corey Arnold · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Speier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Speier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Speier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Speier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Speier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Speier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Speier. The network helps show where William Speier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Speier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Speier Line = papers co-authored together William Speier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020154
2 2007113
3 202192
4
Bidirectional Representation Learning From Transformers Using Multimodal Electronic Health Record Data to Predict Depression
202184
5 201983
6 200267
7 200763
8 201959
9 200955
10 201248
11 201647
12 201147
13 202246
14 201845
15 202043
16 201942
17 202139
18
Classifying Acute Ischemic Stroke Onset Time using Deep Imaging Features.
201738
19 201736
20 201434

About William Speier

William Speier is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 96 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (19 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (10 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (9 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (7 papers), AI in cancer detection (7 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (6 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers) and Topic Modeling (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (79 citations), Health Information Management (105 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (413 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (361 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (534 citations). William Speier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Corey Arnold, Nader Pouratian, Michael Ong, King Chung Ho, Suzie El‐Saden, Jiayun Li, J. Robert Beck, Jessica R. Lu, Wenyuan Li and Alexandra L. Hanlon. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Neural Engineering, Clinical Neurophysiology, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association and Epilepsia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact