William Smith

456 citations
15 papers · 342 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

William Smith

15 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers

William Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Small Animals 75
  • General Energy 9
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 31
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 53
  • Developmental Neuroscience 14
Replace Masahiro Yamada with:
Masahiro Yamada United States
Stephannie Larocque United States
Alexander Livingston United States
Xinrui Li China
Charles A. Berry United States
Colleen Schneider United States
Piotr Zielonka Poland
Nisha Srivastava India
Alexandre Silva Portugal
Étienne Billette de Villemeur France
William Smith relative to Masahiro Yamada United States Masahiro Yamada's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×37.5×
Masahiro Yamada · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Smith. The network helps show where William Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside William Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Smith Line = papers co-authored together William Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201275
2 199362
3 199754
4 195744
5 201243
6 201915
7 202014
8
Education - An Introductory Survey
19588
9 19948
10
Education in Great Britain
19527
11
Government of Education
19655
12
Applying Angelo's Teacher's Dozen to Undergraduate Introductory Economics Classes: A Call for Greater Interactive Learning
20023
13 20152
14 20131
15
Social forces around a sustainability-focused family: School/home Milieu
20151

About William Smith

William Smith is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Small Animals, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 15 papers that have together received 342 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Environmental Education and Sustainability (4 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (3 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (2 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (2 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (2 papers), Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (1 paper), Climate Change Communication and Perception (1 paper) and Epilepsy research and treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (75 citations), General Energy (9 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (31 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (53 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (14 citations). William Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hélyette Geman, Stephen Harrap, Annette Gough, Jing Chen, Geri Kreitzer, Kathleen J. Green, Evangeline V. Amargo and Oxana Nekrasova. Their work appears in journals such as Laboratory Animals, The Journal of Cell Biology, Journal of Biological Education, The Journal of Environmental Education and American Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact