William Smith
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies
- Toxicology top 10%
Papers in
-
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies 6
-
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 6
- Co-authors
- Dominic A. Sisti (4 shared papers)Paul S. Appelbaum (6 shared papers)Harris D. Riley (1 shared paper)Robert C. Ziller (1 shared paper)Carolyn M. Tucker (1 shared paper)Donald R. Mars (1 shared paper)Robert Audi (2 shared papers)Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Psychiatric Services (6 papers)Schizophrenia Research (3 papers)Journal of Medical Ethics (2 papers)JAMA (2 papers)Bioethics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesHong KongUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
William Smith
39 papers receiving 447 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Clinical Psychology 196
- Toxicology 19
- Nephrology 35
- Organic Chemistry 110
- Genetics 39
Countries citing papers authored by William Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of William Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Smith. The network helps show where William Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 95 | |
| 2 | 1960 | 84 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 47 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 46 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 42 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 35 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 10 | National Coalition of STD Directors | 2012 | 7 |
| 11 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 17 | The Vocation of the Scholar | 2010 | 5 |
| 18 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 4 |
About William Smith
William Smith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Health, General Health Professions and Philosophy, having authored 44 papers that have together received 480 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (6 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), Ethics in medical practice (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (196 citations), Toxicology (19 citations), Nephrology (35 citations), Organic Chemistry (110 citations) and Genetics (39 citations). William Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dominic A. Sisti, Paul S. Appelbaum, Harris D. Riley, Robert C. Ziller, Carolyn M. Tucker, Donald R. Mars, Robert Audi, Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Christine Grady and David Wendler. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatric Services, Schizophrenia Research, Journal of Medical Ethics, JAMA and Bioethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.